Why do organizations change data catalog vendors? Take a look at some of the top reasons a change in vendors is needed.
- Change in leadership: The new leader could possess a wealth of expertise from working with alternative data catalogs, or perhaps they have encountered challenges while utilizing the same data catalog in various organizations.
- A package deal from a big vendor: The core data management capabilities of the organization are undergoing a significant transformation, with the introduction of a new vendor who offers a bundled product that includes a data catalog. It is worth noting that the leadership may not possess a comprehensive understanding of the intricacies involved in this exciting change.
- Lower adoptions: The product was launched, but unfortunately, it hasn’t gained as much traction as anticipated. The leader in charge struggled to handle the complex changes required for adoption. Additionally, a considerable number of mid-level managers exhibited minimal involvement in the implementation procedure.
- Product implementation lifecycle: The process of bringing the product to go live is quite time-consuming, and there are numerous customizations required to meet the business requirements. Additionally, it poses a significant challenge for the team to maintain it. Furthermore, upon rolling out to multiple functional areas, legal entities, and geographical regions, it has been discovered that the data catalog is unable to handle the complexities.
- Usage life cycle: The product has been in use by end users for a considerable period of time, and as a result, they have gained a comprehensive understanding of its limitations and areas for improvement. Furthermore, despite providing detailed explanations of user grievances, the Vendor has failed to deliver any of the promised advanced features.
- Meet the demand: The vendor was repeatedly requested to enhance the product in order to align with specific business requirements. However, the vendor’s response time was considerably lengthy in meeting these demands. In certain instances, the vendor could only partially fulfill the stipulated requirements or failed to deliver the promised changes as requested.
- Competitive advantage: All peer organizations are currently utilizing the identical product, prompting the desire to transition towards a contemporary catalog that offers enhanced capabilities in order to attain a competitive advantage.
- Lack of required resources: To ensure the content remains vibrant and dynamic, numerous manual activities are required. However, regrettably, there is a scarcity of allocated resources to carry out these essential tasks. It hinders progress, restricts innovation, and limits the ability to meet the needs and demands.
Does your organization need to change data catalog vendors? Schedule a demo to learn more about EIIG’s data catalog capabilities.
About the Author: Ram Pratti is the Chief Evangelist at Orion Governance, Inc. Connect with Ram on LinkedIn.
recent posts
From Compliance Silos to Compliance Intelligence in the Age of AI
For Chief Compliance Officers, the challenge is no longer simply keeping up with regulations. The greater challenge is that regulations [...]
Maximizing Data Steward Efficiency
A data steward is responsible for ensuring that enterprise data is accurate, well-defined, trusted, and compliant. Much of their [...]
Simplifying Life for Data Engineers
A data engineer benefits from Orion Governance's Enterprise Information Intelligence Graph (EIIG) because it does much more than catalog [...]
Empowering Cloud Architects to Accelerate Their Data Modernization/Cloud Migration Projects
For a cloud architect, one of the greatest challenges in data modernization isn't moving data—it's understanding what should be [...]
What Every Chief Data & Analytics Officer Needs
A Chief Data & Analytics Officer (CDAO) has one of the most challenging roles in the enterprise. They are expected [...]
Orion’s Enterprise Information Intelligence Graph Enables the Chief AI Officer to Ensure the Success of AI Initiatives
A Chief AI Officer (CAIO) is ultimately accountable for ensuring that AI initiatives deliver measurable business value while remaining [...]







